3 Hidden Costs of Sales Performance Management (SPM) Proposals
by Avrami Tzur
August 20, 2020
In its Critical Capabilities for Sales Performance Management report, the global research and advisory firm Gartner rightly recommends to assess vendor capabilities against business requirements and conducting an evaluation process that includes a request for proposal (RFP) and proof of concept (POC).A carefully conducted POC is indeed important. And it does provide great insight into vendor capabilities and how a system might work in your environment. At the same time, the formal proposals received in response to an RFP (or alongside a POC) provide critical information regarding the vendor’s evaluation of your project. An important element of these proposals is – no surprise there – the pricing.Experience has shown that Sales Performance Management (SPM) pricing proposals these days are not always straightforward. This is not necessarily due to intentional misdirection on the part of the vendor but partly because of the costs associated with cloud deployments.Whether intentional or not, many attractive price proposals in the SPM space include hidden costs that you will only learn about later.Typically, SPM pricing is based on a price-per-user formula with a sliding scale. That is, the more users you have, the less expensive the price per user. The trouble arises when you begin implementing your shiny new incentive compensation management system. Then, you may discover additional costs that were not obvious in the proposal, creating misaligned expectations in terms of the solution’s total cost of ownership.Without getting into specific figures, here are three hidden costs you should look for when calculating the long-term value of an SPM solution.